![]() Each chapter is introduced by background material that can alsobe read as a self-contained essay on the Turing Test.Ahn L., Blum M., Hopper N.J., Langford J. Dennett, and Noam Chomsky(in a previously unpublished paper). The bulk of this section, however, consists of papers from a broad spectrumof scholars in the field that directly address the issue of the Turing Test as a test forintelligence. The final section opens with responses to Turing's paper published in Mind soonafter it first appeared. The second section contains allof Turing's writings on the Turing Test, including not only the Mind paper but also less familiarephemeral material. Turing'sproposed thought experiment encapsulates the issues that the writings in The Turing Test define anddiscuss.The first section of the book contains writings by philosophical precursors, includingDescartes, who first proposed the idea of indistinguishablity tests. He was not, as is often assumed,answering the question "Can machines think?" but proposing a more concrete way to ask it. Following Descartes's dictum that itis the ability to speak that distinguishes human from beast, Turing proposed to test whether machineand person were indistinguishable in regard to verbal ability. ![]() Alan Turing's idea, originally expressed in a 1950paper titled "Computing Machinery and Intelligence" and published in the journal Mind, proposed an"indistinguishability test" that compared artifact and person. The Turing Test is part of the vocabulary of popular culture - it has appeared inworks ranging from the Broadway play "Breaking the Code" to the comic strip "Robotman." The writingscollected by Stuart Shieber for this book examine the profound philosophical issues surrounding theTuring Test as a criterion for intelligence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |